Front PageNational News

AG Mbeta, MEC differ on probe over audit queries

Differences between Attorney General Frank Mbeta and Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) have escalated into a verbal war with each side maintaining its respective position over police investigations into alleged financial mismanagement.

While the AG, as the government’s chief legal adviser, insists that police investigators are acting within the law in undertaking investigations at the electoral body, the commission maintains that the due process was not followed.

Mtalimanja: The commission is particularly
concerned. | Nation

Mbeta has advised the Malawi Police Service to proceed with investigations into issues raised in an audit of MEC’s financial management, dismissing the commission’s position that police should wait until MEC formally responds to the Auditor General’s findings.

Mbeta’s opinion followed a July 24 2026 letter in which MEC chairperson Annabel Mtalimanja complained that it was procedurally unfair for Fiscal Police to summon the commission’s officers before management had received the preliminary audit report and given an opportunity to respond to the audit observations.

Yesterday, Fiscal Police in Lilongwe summoned chief elections officer Andrew Mpesi, deputy chief elections officer (Finance and Administration) Andrew Kamkwalala, director of finance Khumbo Phiri and director of administration and human resources Yacinto Chikapa over issues arising from the audit.

In his July 29 2026 response to the MEC complaint, Mbeta said the Public Audit Act does not prevent the police from investigating suspected criminal conduct before an audited institution has responded to audit findings.

Mbeta: Cooperate with the Police. | Nation

Citing Section 14(1) of the Public Audit Act, he argued that while the Auditor General “may require” an affected institution to respond within 14 days, the provision is discretionary and not mandatory.

“There is no provision in the Public Audit Act which bars the Malawi Police Service from carrying out this mandate,” Mbeta wrote. “It is important to note that… the law uses the word ‘may’ which means that the same is discretionary on the Auditor General and not mandatory.”

He also said that an exit meeting between the Auditor General’s team and MEC management was already held, as such, the commission could not claim ignorance of the audit.

“In view of the foregoing, I advise the  commission… to cooperate with the Police or any law enforcement agency as they are carrying out their independent investigations,” Mbeta said, warning that obstructing law enforcement agencies in the execution of their mandate is a criminal offence.

But MEC has maintained that its concern is not about shielding anyone from investigation, but following the audit process as prescribed under the Public Audit Act.

Mtalimanja, a judge of the High Court of Malawi, made the position in her letter to Inspector General of Police dated July 24 2026 copied to AG Mbeta, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Auditor General and other public offices.

She said although MEC management attended an exit meeting with auditors, the commission was assured that a preliminary audit report would subsequently be shared to enable it to submit explanations, clarifications and supporting documentation before the report was finalised.

Mtalimanja said the commission was yet to receive the preliminary report and had, therefore, not been afforded an opportunity to address issues raised by auditors.

“The commission is particularly concerned that the investigation is now requiring responses, explanations or clarifications on matters in the audit report from individual MEC officers before such matters have first been presented to management or to the commission,” she said.

Mtalimanja added that the commission considered it procedurally unfair for its officers to appear before Fiscal Police before the audit process had run its course, while reaffirming MEC’s commitment to cooperate with both the Auditor General and the Secretary to the Treasury until the audit is concluded.

In an interview yesterday, MEC director of media and public relations Sangwani Mwafulirwa confirmed that the four officials appeared before Fiscal Police.

“As of now, we do not have a copy,” he said.

National Police deputy spokesperson Alfred Chimthere did not respond to requests for comment by press time at 8.30pm.

Private practice lawyer Victor Mgonjetsi Chimtolo, who is representing Mpesi, confirmed that his client and the other officials were questioned but not arrested.

Civil Society Elections Integrity Forum chairperson Benedicto Kondowe in an interview said that while police are entitled to investigate suspected offences, the credibility of such investigations could be questioned if they are based on audit findings that have not yet been subjected to the institution’s responses.

The investigations stem from issues highlighted in what the Platform for Investigative Journalism described as a leaked draft administrative audit into MEC’s financial management for the period between April 2022 and May 2026

The standoff is also coming at a time MEC and the Executive are embroiled in a wrangle over the electoral body’s failure to relocate its headquarters from Lilongwe to Blantyre as per President Peter Mutharika’s Executive order issued last October.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button