Economics and Business Forum

Conditions of development

Listen to this article

The end of World War II saw the emergence of independent States out of European colonies in Asia, Africa and the West Indies. This was followed immediately by a spat of books on the theory of development or economic growth.

Intellectual giants like W.Aurther Lewis, W.W.Rostow and H.Myint each gave a formula for the development process. They had no doubt the formulas that had worked in the West could also work in other parts of the world mutatis mtandis.

Sixty years after economic history has demonstrated that there is no such thing as one-size-fits-all in the process of development. A modification of the theory of economic growth was the Washington Consensus which emphasised the role of markets in development and the priority of the private sector.

During that period, the most impressive economic transformations took place in East Asia. In counties like Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea the State and the private sector worked in the sort of partnership that development theoreticians either directly or indirectly condemned. But the results astounded the world.

Does this mean that the theories of economic development contained no elements which can guide us today? They contained quite a lot. Much depends in how much a country turns theories into practical tools.

The pundits identified conditions of economic development which can be divided into internal and external.

Internal Conditions

1.Endowment and physical resources. These include raw materials, land and climate. At present, countries like Ghana, Ethiopia and Tanzania are said to be experiencing high economic growth rates. Botswana during the post-colonial era has become one of the wealthiest countries in Africa. In all these cases, the primary conditions of development have been natural resources.

Malawi has remained poor during most of the time not because its people have been less energetic than other Africans. Rather because its natural resources have not been of the type that attracted billions of dollars in overseas markets.

2. The size of the domestic market.

A large country both geographically and demographically plus adequate income of the people can undergo transformation depending mostly on its internal market. Small countries with tiny populations are handicapped unless world markets are open to them.

3. Social and political conditions.

This included a progressive culture that welcomes efforts at modernisation. Needless to add there must be political stability and peace.

4. Government policies.

The government should pursue clear policies towards achieving economic development. There are times when openness works as was the case with Hong Kong and Singapore. But certain countries have opened their doors to the world like Japan and China. Each country is a specific model. Does the government encourage entrepreneurs?

5. The pattern of income distribution.

Some people advocate uneven distribution of wealth. They say where wealth is concentrated in a few, families savings are high, capital accumulates and there is high development. Others say a more egalitarian distribution fo wealth creates a mass market for basic products like food and textiles. Each government must pursue a policy which is socially as well as economically acceptable.

6.Population growth.

Development is or must be concerned with the people or else what is it for? Too small a population is a barrier to development because it does not provide markets for agricultural and manufacturing products. A population which is too big makes development difficult because government can never raise enough money to build schools and hospitals.

Whatever income is earned is spent on consumption goods instead of invested. A government must advise a population policy that promotes rather than frustrates development.

External conditions

The following external conditions either deter or engender development.

1. The growth of the international community.

The greater the demand foreigners have for a country’s products, the more growth and development it experiences. Africa at present is experiencing high growth rates because the Asian economic giants China and India are buying its commodities on a grand scale.

2. The stability of the international market.

It is not enough that a country is able to sell its commodities like copper, tea and tobacco in world markets. Those markets must not be subject to heavy fluctuations. No development can be achieved if prices of exports rise and fall unpredictably.

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. Thanks for this outline which I appreciate is intended just to provoke our thoughts or to instigate discussions not necessarily providing solutions or taking sides one way or the other but to remain a neutral reporter or analyst. Very noble motive indeed please keep it up.
    I am an advocate for change on the quest to orchestrate economic change (not social or political) in Malawi to bring about economic wealth creation, economic growth and development. So, like you, I was captivated in the first place by these so called pundits about their punditry on development economics and growth. I was looking for the truth as to what develops nations. I came across these punditry commentaries as you have honourably listed them here both internal and external conditions…they are all wrong but one. Here is why.
    1. Resource endowment as a perquisite for development [they are false]. Take Japan one of the most advanced economies in the world. They do not have mineral ores (no industry grade level coal, or iron ores, no gold, nothing). Singapore has practically zilch in everything including lack of land. Hong Kong the same thing. Therefore lack of resources is not show -stopper for economic growth, you just import them. Malawi can develop without any resources.
    2. Size of the domestic market matters limits development [false]. UK is a tiny island compared to Russia. Why did the industrial revolution not start there in Russia or China? If size matters then Singapore, the size less than Blantyre city would have no chance of growth. Lee Kuan Yew’s vision turned that theory upside down. Therefore, size does not matter. Malawi can develop!
    3. Culture that welcomes modernisation [false]. Protestant ethics or the spirit of capitalism is not holding Malawi back. Max Weber used that argument to claim why Europe was the only developed continent in the world. He was wrong! Asia, Americas, Austrasia have done it. Malawians are ready to embrace wealth creation. One has to go outside any factory to see how many desperate people are queuing ready to work. If every Malawian gets a well paying job, their lives will modernise.
    4. Government policy… This I agree. If asked to choose between social progress or economic policies, African govt have chosen social progress or rather they have ignored wealth creating economic policies. When someone commits a nation to agriculture, that is a “do nothing” and an anti national development strategy. Agriculture just means continue doing what you were doing yesterday instead of pursuing intellectual grey matter into industrialisation policies that shift nations from old grandparent activities living outside the cash economy. African govts have wrongly pursued primary resource based economies to the nth degree at the expense of real economic growth strategies. People should wake up, industrialisation is happening in Ethiopia and Uganda.
    5. Pattern of income distribution stops development [false]. Income distribution is an effect not a cause! Create jobs for 12 million Malawians and you have solved it! Agriculture will never create 12 million jobs, industries will for sure.
    6. Amongst the prominent external causes given are colonialisms or Lenin’s favourite – imperialism [False]. US, Canada, Australia, Singapore, or Hong Kong were all former colonies. Where are they now? UK was a Roman conquest.
    What Malawians must understand is there is nothing stopping the country from developing other than lack of an industrialisation policy. I am passionate about this. I have the solution framework to transform this economy into an industrial masterpiece! Let us not commit to trial and error. We must start at the right starting point, with the right sector.

Back to top button