You claim you are under attack. What do you mean?
HRDC is under attack in the sense that there appear to be coordinated efforts to undermine its credibility, weaken its leadership and distract it from its core mandate of promoting human rights and good governance in Malawi. In recent weeks, we have observed several activities, including press briefings by groups not recognised within HRDC’s established structures and messages circulating on social media that are clearly aimed at creating confusion among the public about HRDC’s structures, work and legitimacy. Our concern is not about criticism, which is essential in any democracy. It is about ensuring that discussions about HRDC are grounded in facts, transparency and respect for institutional integrity so that civil society can continue serving all Malawians effectively and without unnecessary distraction.
What do you know about what is being called the HRDC regional ad hoc committee for governance and accountability?
We became aware of this group through media reports, just like many members of the public. However, we wish to clarify that it is not recognised, mandated or affiliated with HRDC in any official capacity. HRDC operates through clearly defined structures and procedures as set out in its constitution, and any legitimate processes or decisions are undertaken within those established governance frameworks. We encourage anyone concerned about HRDC to engage through these formal channels so that issues can be addressed transparently and constructively.
Do you believe politicians are behind this committee?
While we cannot provide conclusive evidence publicly, it is clear that some political actors stand to gain from a weakened HRDC. Civil society’s independent oversight and advocacy are not always convenient for those in power, especially when they expose governance weaknesses or promote accountability. Our focus, however, is not on who may be behind these developments, but on ensuring that the space for independent civic engagement remains protected for the benefit of all Malawians.
Why do you think they are doing this?
These efforts appear aimed at weakening an organisation that consistently calls for transparency, accountability and respect for human rights, which may not align with certain political interests. Around the world, it is not uncommon for institutions that demand accountability to face attempts at discrediting, distraction or fragmentation. HRDC believes that Malawi is best served when civic institutions are allowed to operate independently, hold power to account where necessary and contribute constructively to national dialogue without being distracted.
What is your take on claims by some politicians that HRDC is politicised?
HRDC is not a political grouping and does not take sides in partisan politics. Our work focuses solely on protecting human rights, promoting accountability and strengthening democratic governance — principles that apply regardless of which party is in power. Highlighting governance flaws or defending citizens’ rights is not taking sides, but fulfilling our mandate. Civil society’s role is to hold power to account, and HRDC will continue to do so independently and without fear.
Some people are wondering why HRDC was active during the DPP administration but less visible during the MCP regime?
HRDC has never taken sides in politics. During the previous DPP administration, we were highly visible because urgent governance issues demanded it. Under the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) regime, we continued monitoring governance and human rights through press statements, reporting and direct engagement with authorities. Our approach has always been guided by a careful assessment of the political and civic environment, the safety of citizens and activists, and strategic effectiveness. The fact that we did not organise large-scale protests does not indicate partisanship; it reflects a careful and responsible strategy to advance human rights and accountability while protecting citizens.
What will you do about those who are not part of HRDC but are using its name?
HRDC’s name, reputation and credibility are the product of years of struggle, sacrifice and principled work defending human rights in Malawi. We will continue to protect our identity and legitimacy through public clarification, legal avenues where necessary and consistent communication with Malawians about who HRDC truly is and how it operates.
Have you engaged the DPP on your mandate?
HRDC engages with all political actors, including those who may be sceptical, to explain our mandate and work. Our role is not to align with any party, but to promote human rights, accountability and good governance. We remain open to dialogue with anyone, including the DPP, to foster understanding of civil society’s role in a democracy. However, our independence is non-negotiable. HRDC will continue to speak truth to power and hold all leaders accountable, regardless of political affiliation, because our ultimate responsibility is to the people of Malawi.
What is HRDC’s message to Malawians and politicians?
HRDC is committed to defending the rights and freedoms of all Malawians, regardless of political affiliation. We urge politicians and citizens alike to respect the independence of civil society and to focus on accountability, transparency and the rule of law. HRDC is here to serve the people, not political interests, and we will continue to do so.
