The recent actions of Dalitso Kabambe, the former Reserve Bank Governor and aspiring UTM Party presidential candidate, have thrust him into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Kabambe’s decision to directly request Vice-President Michael Usi to push for a commission of inquiry into the tragic plane crash that claimed the life of former Vice-President Saulos Chilima and eight others has stirred controversy. While the inquiry is a valid national issue—echoed by various citizens and institutions—the manner in which Kabambe acted has raised questions about his motives and his understanding of party dynamics.
At first glance, Kabambe’s request seems innocent enough, aligning with the broader public sentiment. However, it reveals deeper issues within UTM, particularly his apparent failure to consult the party leadership before taking such a step. The party had already written to President Chakwera on this matter, so says the party’s Secretary General Patricia Kaliati. Kabambe’s independent move suggests either a deliberate attempt to gain political mileage or a troubling disconnect between him and the party’s decision-making processes.
Kabambe’s actions raise concerns about internal communication within UTM. How can someone vying for the party’s presidency be unaware of such a crucial step already taken by the party? This exposes a concerning lack of cohesion within the UTM leadership and suggests that critical information is not being effectively communicated. If such a high-profile member is out of the loop, one can only wonder how much more is being kept from the broader party membership.
This incident also casts doubt on Kabambe’s political judgment. It could be interpreted as a calculated move to exploit a national tragedy to boost his profile ahead of the UTM convention. Politicians are known for seeking opportunities to appear relevant, and with UTM in a state of flux following Chilima’s passing, Kabambe may have seen this as a way to position himself as a proactive leader. Yet, in doing so, he risks appearing opportunistic, potentially alienating both the party faithful and the general public.
Moreover, this situation exposes the current disarray within UTM. Once seen as a party of unity and direction, recent events—including leadership bickering and lack of a clear voice. The death of Chilima, a figure who embodied UTM’s identity, has left a void that the party’s top brass seems unable to fill. UTM, a party that was once known for its organizational strength, is now struggling to find its footing. The party must address these internal divisions and find a new sense of direction, or risk further disintegration.
Kabambe’s misstep is more than a personal blunder; it is a symptom of deeper issues plaguing UTM. The party’s leadership needs to step up, communicate more effectively. Without strong, cohesive leadership, UTM risks drifting further into irrelevance at a time when Malawi needs a unified political force capable of addressing national challenges.
